Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


11 January 2007
Females Get Into Sexual Selection Game
by Kate Melville

Peacock tails, the antlers of a bull elk and the lion's mane have all evolved in male animals thanks to competition for reproductive success. These products of sexual selection were typically found only in male animals but it now seems that sexual selection is also alive and well in female meerkats.

In the journal Nature, Earthwatch sponsored researchers describe how female meerkats compete more intensely than males for breeding opportunities. These behaviors result in characteristics more often found in males, such as an increase in size, aggressiveness, and testosterone level.

"Meerkats are ideal models for exploring sexual selection independent of parental investment, because they are cooperative breeders," said Prof. Timothy Clutton-Brock, principal investigator of Earthwatch's Meerkats of the Kalahari project. Meerkats breed cooperatively in groups of 3 to 50 where all of the members of that group work together to raise and protect their pups, most of which are the offspring of the dominant pair. Past research suggested that males were the object of sexual selection because they usually invested less energy in their offspring than their female counterparts. Without the full-time job of rearing their young, males are more often free to strut and shove and preen to maximum effect.

But the researchers found that a dominant female usually monopolized reproduction for up to ten years, producing an average of 17 pups that survive their first year. As a consequence, several other females in the group produced no pups at all during that time period. This extreme variation in reproductive success is what leads to the relative greater size and aggressiveness of dominant females, and female meerkats in general.

Clutton-Brock suggests that these findings call for an examination of definitions of sexual selection. Current use tends to emphasize competition between males for mates. The alternative proposed by the authors is to return to Darwin's description that involves competition for reproductive opportunities, a broader definition that could include competition between cooperatively breeding females.

Related articles:
For Some Females, Size Does Matter
Researchers Investigate Giant Sperm Paradox
Sexual Success And The Schizoid Factor

Source: Earthwatch Institute
Pic courtesy Diane Troppoli/Earthwatch Institute


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.