Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Latest Posts
Do you know right from wrong?
by paul
0 seconds ago
Is this a flaw in Quantum Superposition logic?
by quantumfinder
59 minutes 39 seconds ago
Where and Who is God ?
by socratus
Today at 07:24 AM
New Intro for Origin of Species
by TheFallibleFiend
Today at 06:06 AM
"Gravit;y's Secret"
by quantumfinder
Today at 05:04 AM
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


10 May 2007
Star Shows Its Age
by Kate Melville

Astronomers using the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) have accurately dated a star that formed at the dawn of time - a mere 500 million years after the Big Bang. The "fossil" star, known as HE 1523-0901, was found to be 13.2 billion years old, not very far from the 13.7 billion years age of the Universe.

Reporting the discovery in the Astrophysical Journal, astronomer Anna Frebel said that it was notoriously difficult to accurately gauge the age of stars. "[It] requires measuring very precisely the abundance of the radioactive elements thorium or uranium, a feat only the largest telescopes such as ESO's VLT can achieve."

The technique used is analogous to the carbon-14 dating method used in archaeology. However, because vastly longer timescales are involved, the right choice of radioactive isotope is critical for accurate measurements. The faster the decay, the less there will be left of the radioactive isotope after a certain time, so the greater will be the difference when compared to a stable isotope, and the more accurate is the measured age. But for the clock to remain useful, the radioactive element must not decay too fast - there must still be enough left of it to allow an accurate measurement, even after several billion years.

"Actual age measurements are restricted to the very rare objects that display huge amounts of the radioactive elements thorium or uranium," explained co-discoverer Norbert Christlieb. Large amounts of these elements were observed in HE 1523-0901, an old, relatively bright star in our own Milky Way.

The dating process involved capturing the spectrum from the star for both thorium and uranium in combination with the three other neutron-capture elements - europium, osmium, and iridium. Unaffected by the turbulent history of the Milky Way, these steadfast nuclear timekeepers have ticked away ever since the star was born, a mind-boggling 13.2 billion years ago.

Related articles:
Big Bang Brouhaha Brewing
Star Formation Theories Set For Significant Revision
Stars Gone Wild

Source: European Southern Observatory


Popular Reads...
In space, no one can hear you say "doh!"
Universe's holographic noise mystifies boffins
Sexual success and the schizoid brain
Bow to your insect overlords!
Pecker research yields stretching surprise
We come in peace – not!
Cold fusion a hot topic – again
Missing link a tripping chimp?
Dust formations alive?
Unnatural selection: Courtesy of The Pill

Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.